CEO Replication Program Data

Table 2. Three-Year Impacts on Recidivism, by Time Between Prison Release and Random Assignment Center for Employment Opportunities
Length of Time Between Prison Release and Random Assignment
3 Months or Less More Than 3 Months Difference Between Subgroup Impactsa
Outcome Program Group Control Group Difference (Impact) P-Value Program Group Control Group Difference (Impact) P-Value
Ever arrestedb (%) 49.1 59.1 -10.0 * 0.056 47.0 50.5 -3.5 0.420
Ever convicted of a crimec (%) 44.0 56.7 -12.7 ** 0.014 42.7 45.7 -3.0 0.493
Convicted of a felony 15.6 14.6 1.0 0.789 6.8 10.2 -3.4 0.156
Convicted of a misdemeanor 31.9 46.1 -14.3 *** 0.005 35.5 36.8 -1.3 0.764 ††
Ever incarceratedd (%) 60.2 71.3 -11.2 ** 0.027 57.1 63.2 -6.1 0.147
Prison 38.9 43.4 -4.5 0.387 33.1 31.6 1.4 0.722
Jail 56.7 71.4 -14.7 *** 0.004 56.7 60.0 -3.4 0.428
Ever incarcerated for a new crime (%) 26.5 35.4 -8.9 * 0.061 22.7 24.7 -2.0 0.593
Prison 11.2 12.5 -1.4 0.685 5.9 8.8 -2.8 0.209
Jail 16.4 25.6 -9.1 ** 0.030 17.9 17.1 0.7 0.822
Ever incarcerated for a technical parole violation (%) 38.5 39.8 -1.3 0.801 36.8 34.2 2.6 0.528
Prison 23.8 25.5 -1.7 0.717 22.3 16.8 5.5 0.110
Jail 34.2 35.1 -0.9 0.856 36.1 31.2 4.9 0.228
Total days incarcerated 213 247 -34 0.234 154 151 3 0.872
Prison 118 138 -20 0.345 82 85 -3 0.852
Jail 95 109 -14 0.334 72 66 6 0.560
Ever arrested, convicted, or incarceratede (%) 66.8 75.8 -9.0 * 0.063 64.3 70.2 -5.9 0.148
Incarcerated at the end of Year 3f (%) 30.1 36.1 -6.0 0.221 22.5 27.4 -4.9 0.195
Sample size (total = 929)g (%) 225 160 311 233
SOURCE: MDRC calculations using data from the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) and the New York City Department of Correction (DOC).
NOTES: Results in this table are weighted by week of random assignment and adjusted for pre-random assignment characteristics. Statistical significance levels are indicated as: *** = 1 percent; ** = 5 percent; * = 10 percent.
a When comparing impacts between two subgroups, an H-statistic is generated. The H-statistic is used to assess whether the difference in impacts between the subgroups is statistically significant. It is interpretable in much the same way as the t-statistic and the F-statistic from analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests are interpreted. Statistically significant differences across subgroups are indicated as: ††† = 1 percent; †† = 5 percent; † = 10 percent.
b Each arrest date is counted only as a single event. If there are multiple crimes or charges on the same date, only one the most serious charge is recorded in the analysis.
c A total of 23 convictions were found to be associated with an arrest that occurred prior to random assignment. These convictions are counted in the analysis as occurring after random assignment.
d Includes all reasons for incarceration, such as sentences for new crimes, technical violations of parole, detainee (jail), and other admission reasons. A sample member may have multiple admissions; therefore, incarcerations for new crimes and parole violations do not sum to the percentage incarcerated.
e This composite measure was created by combining three measures that are not mutually exclusive: arrest, conviction, and incarceration. Participants who were arrested and/or convicted, for example, were also incarcerated. The composite measure represents people who experienced one or more of these recidivism measures.
f Incarceration status based on Quarter 12 after random assignment. Incarceration includes both prison and jail.
g A total of 48 sample members are missing the last prison release date and are therefore missing from all outcomes in this table.

Daaim's Note The percent difference in the Total days incarcerated between those who join the program within 3 months of their release and the control group is 14.7826%.

 

Table 3. Three-Year Impacts on Employment and Recidivism, by Number of Prior Convictions at Baseline Center for Employment Opportunities
Prior Convictions at Baseline
1-3 Convictions 4 or More Convictions Difference Between Subgroup Impactsa
Outcome Program Group Control Group Difference (Impact) P-Value Program Group Control Group Difference (Impact) P-Value
Employment outcomes (%)
Ever any employmentc 80.0 75.5 4.5 0.270 86.9 65.6 21.3 *** 0.000 †††
Ever worked in a CEO transitional jobd 58.8 4.7 54.2 *** 0.000 74.3 2.4 71.9 *** 0.000 †††
Ever worked in an unsubsidized job 63.9 73.4 -9.6 ** 0.036 64.2 65.0 -0.8 0.839
Postprogram employment and earnings outcomes (Years 2-3)
Average quarterly unsubsidized employment (%) 27.6 29.7 -2.1 0.540 28.8 24.7 4.1 0.155
Total UI-covered earningse ($) 11,576 10,135 1,441 0.546 9,770 9,581 188 0.908
Recidivism outcomes
Ever arrestedf (%) 38.6 41.2 -2.6 0.608 54.5 62.9 -8.4 ** 0.050
Ever convicted of a crimeg (%) 35.2 32.5 2.8 0.575 49.1 61.9 -12.8 *** 0.003 ††
Convicted of a felony 11.3 8.3 3.0 0.323 9.2 15.1 -5.9 ** 0.036 ††
Convicted of a misdemeanor 23.3 22.8 0.5 0.912 42.0 52.0 -10.0 ** 0.021
Incarceratedh (%) 47.7 61.0 -13.2 *** 0.006 65.0 71.0 -6.0 0.134
Total days incarcerated 142 144 -2 0.914 196 227 -31 0.169
Sample size (total = 951) 216 172 337 226
SOURCE: MDRC employment calculations using data from unemployment insurance (UI) wage records from New York State and earnings data from the National Directory of New Hires (NDNH) database. Incarceration calculations use data from the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) and the New York City Department of Correction (DOC).
NOTES: Results in this table are weighted by week of random assignment and adjusted for pre-random assignment characteristics. Statistical significance levels are indicated as: *** = 1 percent; ** = 5 percent; * = 10 percent.
a Standard errors are presented in this report for all impacts with a p-value of 0.000. Following are the standard errors for all impacts with a p-value of 0.000 (presented in the order in which they appear in the table and beginning with the "1-3 Convictions" subgroup): Employment: 3.951, 3.482, and 3.140.
b When comparing impacts between two subgroups, an H-statistic is generated. The H-statistic is used to assess whether the difference in impacts between the subgroups is statistically significant. It is interpretable in much the same way as the t-statistic and the F-statistic from analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests are interpreted. Statistically significant differences across subgroups are indicated as: ††† = 1 percent; †† = 5 percent; † = 10 percent.
c These outcomes reflect only UI-covered employment and earnings.
d CEO transitional employment is estimated from NDNH and CEO's management information system (MIS).
e Due to missing earnings data for Year 1, this report includes impacts for only Years 2 and 3.
f Each arrest date is counted only as a single event. If there are multiple crimes or charges on the same date, only one the most serious charge is recorded in the analysis.
g A total of 23 convictions were found to be associated with an arrest that occurred prior to random assignment. These convictions are counted in the analysis as occurring after random assignment.
h Includes all reasons for incarceration, such as sentences for new crimes, technical violations of parole, detainee (jail), and other admission reasons. A sample member may have multiple admissions; therefore, incarcerations for new crimes and parole violations do not sum to the percentage incarcerated.

Daaim's Note The percent difference in the Total days incarcerated between those who join the program within 3 months of their release and the control group is 14.7826%.

 

APPENDIX TABLE C.1 Participation in CEO Activities: Each Replication Program Compared with New York City
Outcome New York City Albany Buffalo Rochester San Diego Tulsa
Ever worked in a CEO transitional job (%) 88.4 70.8 *** 70.4 *** 67.5 *** 94.2 *** 93.8 ***
Assessed for job-start readiness (%) 88.2 88.6 86.3 79.5 *** 89.4 85.6
Determined to be job-start ready (%) 64.5 74.3 *** 78.8 *** 76.4 *** 73.4 *** 75.8 ***
Met with a job coach (%) 81.7 58.5 *** 86.0 ** 67.8 *** 76.3 ** 91.5 ***
Met with a job developer (%) 56.4 61.4 * 77.7 *** 65.8 *** 68.6 *** 82.2 ***
Among those who worked in a CEO transitional job
Days worked in a CEO transitional joba (%) *** *** *** *** *** ***
1-10 33.7 38.8 34.7 41.1 40.7 34.3
11-20 20.5 26.0 30.9 23.9 19.8 24.5
21-30 14.0 13.2 12.6 13.7 16.7 16.8
31-40 20.2 13.2 13.0 11.7 11.2 15.4
More than 41 20.2 13.2 13.0 11.7 11.2 15.4
Average days worked in a CEO transitional job 23.2 19.7 *** 19.0 *** 18.4 *** 19.5 *** 21.7
Average number of meetings with job coach 3.2 1.0 *** 1.3 *** 1.3 *** 1.7 *** 1.7 ***
Average number of meetings with job developer 3.8 2.3 *** 3.2 *** 3.9 4.5 ** 4.3 *
Total weeks of active engagement with programb 13.2 10.3 *** 12.2 12.6 11.7 * 8.9 ***
Placed in an unsubsidized jobc (%) 34.7 48.8 *** 53.4 *** 57.4 *** 38.8 52.5 ***
Among those who were placed in an unsubsidized job
Unsubsidized job characteristics
Average starting wage ($) 9.72 9.59 9.43 9.10 *** 9.00 *** 8.79 ***
Hours per week 33.5 34.8 *** 36.0 *** 33.4 * 36.7 *** 37.6 ***
Employer provided benefits (%) 17.7 23.0 24.9 ** 28.8 *** 57.4 *** 24.1 *
Ever received a Rapid Rewards paymentd (%) 75.2 93.4 *** 93.8 *** 96.0 *** 79.3 * 93.0 ***
Among those who received a Rapid Rewards Paymentd
Number of Rapid Rewards payments 2.8 5.4 *** 5.8 *** 6.2 *** 4.7 *** 5.9 ***
Total amount of Rapid Rewards payments ($) 177.81 150.76 *** 186.95 *** 216.55 *** 125.60 *** 169.58 ***
Sample size 2,560 342 372 292 274 388
SOURCE: MDRC calculations from CEO's management information system.
NOTES: The samples from all programs include people who enrolled in CEO between January 2012 and September 2013. In order to assess differences in characteristics between the New York City program and the replication programs, chi-square tests were used for categorical variables and two-tailed t-tests were used for continuous variables. Statistical significance levels are indicated as follows: *** = 1 percent; ** = 5 percent; * = 10 percent.
a Days worked may not be consecutive.
b This measure is calculated from the date of first enrollment to the date of first placement in an unsubsidized job, or to the last date of employment in a CEO transitional job.
c This includes unsubsidized employment placements by CEO and self-placement employment that CEO was made aware of or that the client reported to CEO.
d These measures include only people who enrolled in CEO between January 2012 and March 30, 2013 to allow for 12 months of follow-up, as individuals can receive Rapid Rewards for up to six months following placement into an unsubsidized job.

 

APPENDIX TABLE C.2 Participant Experiences, by Program
Measure (%) All Programs NYC Albany Buffalo Rochester San Diego Tulsa
Length of employment
Less than one month 30.2 17.4 22.2 31.9 32.0 20.0 54.3
One month 16.7 8.7 33.3 17.0 32.0 16.7 11.4
Two months 22.4 15.2 33.3 29.8 20.0 26.7 17.1
Three months 12.0 19.6 0.0 10.6 12.0 10.0 8.6
More than three months 18.8 39.1 11.1 10.6 4.0 26.7 8.6
Tasks during a typical daya
Assemble parts 7.3 10.9 0.0 4.3 12.0 3.3 8.6
Operate machines or equipment 20.3 13.0 0.0 21.3 8.0 6.7 54.3
Check or inspect products or equipment 10.4 6.5 0.0 10.6 12.0 6.7 20.0
Answer or make telephone calls 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0
Use a computer 5.7 2.2 11.1 6.4 0.0 13.3 5.7
Do general office work (filing, copying, etc.) 2.6 2.2 0.0 2.1 4.0 3.3 2.9
Interact with customers 9.4 6.5 0.0 6.4 4.0 16.7 17.1
Clean or maintain work spaces 79.2 82.6 88.9 74.5 72.0 73.3 88.6
Stock or organize products 15.1 21.7 33.3 6.4 4.0 6.7 28.6
Operate cash register 1.6 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 3.3 0.0
Operate cash register 1.6 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 3.3 0.0
Provide food service 2.1 2.2 0.0 2.1 0.0 6.7 0.0
Other 39.1 21.7 22.2 38.3 56.0 46.7 48.6
Services receiveda
Help arranging child care 4.8 7.1 0.0 10.4 4.0 0.0 0.0
Transportation assistance 38.3 45.2 37.5 35.4 32.0 23.3 51.4
Help addressing housing problems 9.6 4.8 0.0 18.8 12.0 3.3 8.6
Anger-management classes 3.2 4.8 0.0 6.3 4.0 0.0 0.0
Alcohol or substance abuse treatment 4.3 4.8 12.5 8.3 4.0 0.0 0.0
Counseling/parenting classes 2.7 2.4 0.0 2.1 4.0 3.3 2.9
Help with work-appropriate clothing 42.6 42.9 50.0 39.6 36.0 23.3 65.7
Computer training 17.0 9.5 12.5 16.7 8.0 33.3 20.0
GED preparation 9.6 23.8 12.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 2.9
Career planning/résumé writing/job interview preparation/job search help 67.6 57.1 75.0 62.5 64.0 83.3 74.3
General money-management assistance 18.6 21.4 25.0 27.1 16.0 20.0 2.9
Help setting up a bank account 11.2 28.6 62.5 6.3 0.0 0.0 2.9
Access to benefits 13.3 26.2 12.5 20.8 8.0 3.3 0.0
Help understanding or changing child support payments 4.3 9.5 12.5 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Legal assistance 5.3 9.5 0.0 6.3 8.0 0.0 2.9
Parole assistance 23.4 35.7 37.5 12.5 40.0 3.3 25.7
Other 8.0 4.8 12.5 12.5 4.0 3.3 11.4
None 5.4 4.9 0.0 8.3 8.0 6.9 0.0
Services needed but not received
Help arranging child care 8.3 17.1 0.0 4.9 8.3 7.1 5.7
Transportation assistance 17.2 25.7 16.7 7.3 20.8 14.3 20.0
Help addressing housing problems 14.8 22.9 16.7 7.3 20.8 10.7 14.3
Anger-management classes 5.9 8.6 0.0 2.4 12.5 7.1 2.9
Alcohol or substance abuse treatment 5.9 8.6 0.0 2.4 4.2 10.7 5.7
Counseling/parenting classes 4.7 2.9 16.7 0.0 8.3 7.1 5.7
Help with work-appropriate clothing 9.5 14.3 0.0 4.9 12.5 17.9 2.9
Computer training 10.1 17.1 16.7 4.9 8.3 7.1 11.4
GED preparation 8.3 5.7 0.0 7.3 12.5 17.9 2.9
Career planning/résumé writing/job interview preparation/job search help 9.5 14.3 0.0 7.3 4.2 14.3 8.6
General money-management assistance 12.4 20.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 14.3 20.0
Help setting up a bank account 13.6 20.0 0.0 2.4 16.7 17.9 17.1
Access to benefits 9.5 14.3 33.3 2.4 8.3 7.1 11.4
Help understanding or changing child support payments 5.9 5.7 16.7 4.9 4.2 7.1 5.7
Legal assistance 5.9 0.0 16.7 7.3 8.3 7.1 5.7
Parole assistance 5.9 5.7 0.0 4.9 4.2 10.7 5.7
Other 5.9 0.0 16.7 7.3 0.0 14.3 5.7
None 36.7 31.4 33.3 58.5 20.8 32.1 31.4
Agree or strongly agree with the following statements:b
I am doing work that is very important to the organization/company where I work. 63.7 52.2 44.4 64.6 68.0 73.3 71.4
I understand what is expected of me on the job. 85.0 84.8 66.7 83.3 76.0 90.0 94.3
I know whom at work to ask for help when I need it. 88.6 93.5 66.7 87.5 76.0 90.0 97.1
I get the support or guidance that I need from my supervisor. 83.9 78.3 33.3 85.4 84.0 93.3 94.3
My supervisor gives me advice about how to handle situations at work. 82.4 71.7 33.3 89.6 80.0 90.0 94.3
My supervisor helps me if personal issues come up that get in the way of working. 66.3 52.2 11.1 79.2 76.0 66.7 74.3
My relationships with coworkers are positive and supportive. 82.4 80.4 66.7 85.4 72.0 80.0 94.3
My coworkers understand me and want me to succeed. 74.6 71.7 66.7 77.1 64.0 73.3 85.7
My responsibilities have increased since I began this job. 72.5 73.9 44.4 72.9 64.0 80.0 77.1
I have opportunities to grow and take on new responsibilities in this job. 71.5 67.4 44.4 81.3 64.0 70.0 77.1
I am satisfied in this job. 61.1 54.3 22.2 79.2 68.0 50.0 60.0
Overall, I feel better about myself since beginning this job. 78.2 71.7 22.2 79.2 80.0 86.7 91.4
The kind of work I am doing will help me get a decent-paying job later. 67.4 60.9 44.4 70.8 68.0 73.3 71.4
I am learning specific job skills that I will use in the future. 67.9 71.7 55.6 70.8 68.0 63.3 65.7
I have met people through this job who may help me find a job in the future. 69.9 63.0 55.6 79.2 80.0 63.3 68.6
I am learning how to work better with coworkers. 75.1 76.1 55.6 81.3 68.0 76.7 74.3
I am learning how to cooperate better with supervisors. 78.8 82.6 44.4 75.0 76.0 83.3 85.7
This job has helped me learn to present myself better at work. 78.8 80.4 55.6 77.1 76.0 83.3 82.9
I am late to work less often than when I began this job.
Agree 26.5 26.1 22.2 17.4 36.0 34.5 26.5
Disagree 18.5 21.7 11.1 23.9 24.0 13.8 8.8
Does not apply (did not need to improve in this area) 55.0 52.2 66.7 58.7 40.0 51.7 64.7
Without CEO, I would likely still be unemployed.b 56.5 50.0 22.2 64.6 56.0 66.7 54.3
Without CEO, I would likely be back in prison.b 22.3 21.7 0.0 20.8 28.0 23.3 25.7
As a result of CEO...a
I have better job skills. 72.5 72.1 75.0 75.0 52.0 83.3 74.3
I am better at working with others. 66.7 67.4 50.0 68.8 52.0 83.3 62.9
I feel more in control of my finances. 48.7 48.8 62.5 58.3 16.0 50.0 54.3
I have a greater sense of well-being. 57.1 53.5 37.5 56.3 44.0 73.3 62.9
I feel better able to handle responsibilities and challenges in my personal life so that they don't get in the way of my job. 59.8 74.4 50.0 54.2 28.0 73.3 62.9
My relationships with my family members are better. 38.6 46.5 25.0 35.4 28.0 46.7 37.1
I feel better prepared to find a new job. 73.0 76.7 75.0 68.8 48.0 83.3 82.9
I feel better able to meet my basic needs (for example, food, clothing, shelter, transportation). 48.1 55.8 37.5 41.7 32.0 70.0 42.9
My self-esteem has improved. 57.7 60.5 37.5 50.0 36.0 70.0 74.3
Other 9.5 11.6 0.0 16.7 4.0 6.7 5.7
Sample size 193 46 9 48 25 30 35
SOURCE: MDRC calculations from CEO's management information system.
NOTES: GED = General Educational Development
a These measures show the percentages of questionnaire respondents who agreed with each statement. Respondents were instructed to select all statements that applied to them
b These measure show the percentages of participants who selected 6 or 7 on a 7-point scale where 1 = "strongly disagree" and 7 = "strongly agree."