The Best Training Tactics According to the Evidence
Trainings can be time consuming and costly endeavors. It is imperative that the valuable resources of time and money are not wasted. What follows are a few vital points drawn from the empirical literature on “training,” which practitioners can use when implementing training programs. These are tools that can help organizations improve the ability of their workers to transfer training to actual work situations.
I will start by defining two important terms, Transfer of training and Generalization. Understanding these concepts will help you understand and apply the information in this brief. Conceptually, Transfer of training refers to the extent to which trainees apply, generalize, and maintain knowledge, skills, and abilities gained via training to their work.1 Generalization is the process of recognizing when knowledge, skills, and behaviors gained in one place or context can be applied to other situations.
To support transfer, trainees' individual characteristics should be considered and tended to during the recruiting and selection processes. There are at least five specific areas that affect the outcomes of training:
- Cognitive abilities— an individual’s overall intelligence; their capacity to comprehend complex ideas, adapt to their environments, learn from experiences and employ assorted modes of reasoning.2
- Self-efficacy— represents an individual’s belief or judgment that they have the ability to successfully perform a given task.3
- Motivation— the processes that reveal an individual's vigor, direction and capacity for staying the course in their efforts towards accomplishing a goal or objective.4
- Instrumentality— the perceived usefulness or value associated with participation in training events.
- Expectancy— an individual’s belief that their efforts will result in the attainment of resources and capabilities that will bolster their performance, leading to desirable rewards.5, 6
While I touch on each of the five strategic areas, this brief primarily focuses on self-efficacy and motivation.
Key tactics associated with the successful transfer of training
- Transfer of training is facilitated when:
- Trainees’ recognize the relationship between training lessons and performance outcomes.
- Trainees’ view the acquisition of these new skills as valuable.
- Trainees’ recognize the connection of acquired skills to their job success.7 8
- Remember—organizational leaders must clearly convey the objectives and significance of the training from the outset and throughout the process.
- Conduct a needs analysis to determine your organization’s training needs.
- A needs analysis or assessment can help determine if the organization’s needs, goal, and objectives can be met via training.9
- A needs analysis can also reveal if an organizational problem can be solved through training.10
- A needs analysis can be divided into three steps—
- An organizational analysis, e.g.,
- Which organizational goals can be accomplished through training?
- Where in the organization is training needed?
- A task analysis, e.g.,
- What learning targets that will improve trainee’s job performance?
- Personnel analysis, e.g.,
- Which individuals need training?
- In what area do they need training?
- Remember—by first assessing the needs of trainees or causes of under-performance, trainers can determine what training intervention is most suitable for the objective that managers or their subordinates aim to accomplish.
- Design or choose training paradigms with strategies that incorporate behavior modeling:
- Provide trainees with operative models demonstrating the effective use of targeted behaviors, opportunities to observe and practice the skills during the training event.11
- Provide them with well defined motives + explicit objectives and explanations of behaviors to be learned.12
- Give trainees a chance to establish personal goals related to the overarching training goal(s) and provide opportunities that contribute to the development of training related practice regimes.
- Provide trainees with opportunities to generate their own practice scenarios during training.13
- Grant them in-training opportunities to practice learned skills, plenty of time for in-training practice scenarios, and provide them with performance feedback.14
- Important Note—evidence suggests that behavioral modeling is most effective when positive (exemplary or correct) and negative (non exemplary or incorrect) models are presented to trainees.15
- Important Note—there also strong evidence suggesting that displaying multiple scenarios for trainees enhance training outcomes.16 17 18
- Note— According to the empirical literature on behavioral modeling training, the transfer of training is greatest when trainees' supervisors’ also receive training.19
- Allow for and support an error management post-training atmosphere:
- Let trainees make mistakes (opportunities for trainees to experience potential problems) and provide them with insight or instructions on how to manage their mistakes.21 Error management training bolsters trainees' ability to anticipate and address potential problems they may encounter later in real-world situations.22
- Provide trainees a safe environment to realize the benefits of acquired knowledge.23
- Error management is particularly potent during post-training debriefing exercises, rather than during the primary training modules.24
- Remember— Error management strategy can reveal common problem-solving errors of the uninitiated. Providing information about incorrect behaviors is nearly as important as communicating target behaviors.25 Transfer of training is facilitated when trainees are given information about errors they may encounter and how to deal with them.
- Provide learners with a contextually relevant practice environment:
- The training environment should be as realistic as possible, closely matching the circumstances that workers will encounter in real-life situations.26 27
- Practicing new skills in a realistic setting promotes active learning.28
- Make sure to challenge trainees throughout the training process:
- Incorporate a high degree of variability to practice trials.29 This means using variations in the initial conditions of a task during training practice so that parameters are continually changing.30
- Measure the impact of the training:
- Incorporate a high degree of variability to practice trials.29 This means using variations in the initial conditions of a task during training practice so that parameters are continually changing.30
Self-efficacy
Self-efficacy is an individual’s judgment of their capabilities to succeed in specific situations or achieve a task.31 A person’s assessment of self-efficacy influences the degree of effort and persistence they will commit to a challenging task, as well as their resilience to failures.32, 33 When facing difficulties, a person experiencing low self-efficacy (having serious doubts about their abilities to surmount the challenge) will decrease their efforts if not give up altogether. Conversely, when in the same situation, the person with a high sense of self-efficacy will expend greater energy to master the challenge.34 If the person with high self-efficacy does fail, they will likely attribute their failure to an inadequate effort, while the person with low self-efficacy will attribute their failure to their lack of ability.35 In other words, the person with a low sense of self-efficacy is likely to think 'I failed because I just can't do it', while their counterpart with a high sense of self-efficacy will think 'I can do it, I just have to try harder.'
- Self-efficacy has been continually linked to transfer outcomes.36 37
- For trainees to transfer new competencies to the job, they have to believe that they can successfully acquire and perform the new skills.38
- Interventions aimed at bolstering learner self-efficacy can improve training performance.38
- Self-efficacy is important because it can be an indicator of a trainee’s persistence or commitment to the training process. Remember, those with a low level of self-efficacy have a higher likelihood of lessening or discontinuing the training as the process increases in difficulty. Conversely, those demonstrating a higher degree of self-efficacy are more likely to expend extra effort as the process becomes more challenging.39
- Remember— Self-efficacy refers to trainees' judgment of their ability to acquire new knowledge, skills, or abilities. The greater the trainee's self-efficacy, “… the more confidence they will have in their ability to successfully acquire targeted skills and perform trained tasks”.40
- Beware— of trainees having too much self-efficacy, which can result in over-confidence and consequently, less motivation to learn, and diminished engagement in training exercises.
- Be cognizant— that self-efficacy alone is not a reliable predictor of trainees' likely success or failure to effectively transfer learned knowledge, skills, or abilities into valuable performance outcomes. The importance of self-efficacy to training and knowledge transfer is nuanced; for instance, research has found that the predictive power of self-efficacy decreases as the complexity of the task increases.41
Motivation
Motivation is the processes that explain an individual's vigor, direction and the endurance of their effort towards accomplishing a goal or objective.42 The strength of an individual’s motivation is expressed via the goals, the courses of action they choose, and the amount of energy and persistence of their effort.43 Individual’s pre-training characteristics, particularly motivation, influences their learning outcomes. Pre-training motivation refers to trainee’s attitudes, expectancies, and self-beliefs, which impact their willingness to participate in, and learn from training.44 Additionally, pre-training motivation and self-efficacy are linked. Pre-training self-efficacy is an individual’s belief that they have the capability to learn or acquire the knowledge, skills, and behaviors targeted during training. When trainees believe they can successfully achieve learning outcomes, their motivation is strengthened and it is likely they will exert the effort needed to gain the relevant knowledge, skills, and behaviors.35
- Motivation is associated with the degree of diligence, direction and persistence trainees dedicated to achieving training objectives.46
- A 1995 study of 967 people found a moderately strong positive relationship between pre-training motivation and training transfer as measured by supervisors; in other words, pre-training motivation explains about 20% of variance in training transfer.47
- According to the same 1995 study, it is important that trainees believe that their training efforts will lead to positive, performance-enhancing outcomes, as well as believing they are capable of learning the new material in order for transfer to occur.48
- Recent studies of the effects of trainee characteristics on training effectiveness have found that trainees’ motivation to learn and motivation to transfer exert a significant influence on training outcomes.49 50
- Research suggests motivation can be impacted by interventions. Note— There is strong evidence that goal setting is a viable strategy for strengthening motivation.51
However, there are limitations and moderating factors associated with goal setting interventions, including being too narrowly focused, or “the psychological costs associated with goal failure.52 Additionally, goal setting should be used in situations where trainees’ efforts to accomplish the goals are transparent. Situation where trainees are held accountable for specific outcomes reduces the likelihood that they will engage in unethical behavior to reach the goals.53
Conclusion
I know that I have covered a lot of information in this brief, but don’t feel overwhelmed. By keeping some salient points in mind, you will gradually improve the learning outcomes of your training events.
When you are designing and implementing a training, keep three major overarching areas in mind: your audience, environment, and goals. While considering these three areas, ask critical questions, collect some evidence that tests your assumptions, interview stakeholders, and take the information you gather and apply it to the design of your training.
When considering your audience, do some pre-training leg-work so that you can accurately answer a few critical questions about trainees’ self-efficacy, motivation, and the value they expect to reap from the training. During this information gathering process, you can also collect data related to your goals by conducting a needs analysis.
Next, make sure to establish a training environment that supports the transfer of training— designing the training to match the context of practice as closely as possible. During the training, model the behaviors or skills you want trainees to learn, either via practice scenarios, videos, computer simulations, and case studies. Throughout the training, challenge trainees by continually changing characteristics of the task being trained.
Make trainees feel comfortable making mistakes and use these errors as opportunities to have open discussions or group brainstorming events. Be sure that multi-directional feedback is a part of the process— giving trainees constructive feedback about their performance in practice scenarios and collecting evaluations from trainees about the training.
Finally, remember the measure the effectiveness of the training. As you get better at the process, routinely revisit the information in this brief, gradually applying more of the strategies.
Abstract: Transfer of training is of paramount concern for training researchers and practitioners. Despite research efforts, there is a growing concern over the “transfer problem.” The purpose of this paper is to provide a critique of the existing transfer research and to suggest directions for future research investigations. The conditions of transfer include both the generalization of learned material to the job and the maintenance of trained skills over a period of time on the job. The existing research examining the effects of training design, trainee, and work-environment factors on conditions of transfer is reviewed and critiqued. Research gaps identified from the review include the need to (1) test various operationalizations of training design and work-environment factors that have been posited as having an impact on transfer and (2) develop a framework for conducting research on the effects of trainee characteristics on transfer. Needed advancements in the conceptualization and operationalization of the criterion of transfer are also discussed.
Abstract: Although organizations invest billions of dollars in training every year, many trained competencies reportedly fail to transfer to the workplace. Researchers have long examined the ‘transfer problem’, uncovering a wealth of information regarding the transfer of training. Inconsistencies remain, however, and organizations may find it difficult to pinpoint exactly which factors are most critical. Using Baldwin and Ford's model of transfer, we identify the factors relating to trainee characteristics (cognitive ability, self-efficacy, motivation, perceived utility of training), training design (behavioral modeling, error management, realistic training environments) and the work environment (transfer climate, support, opportunity to perform, follow-up) that have exhibited the strongest, most consistent relationships with the transfer of training. We describe our reasoning for extracting such variables from the literature and conclude by discussing potential implications for practice and future research.
Abstract: Addresses the centrality of the self-efficacy mechanism (SEM) in human agency. SEM precepts influence thought patterns, actions, and emotional arousal. In causal tests, the higher the level of induced self-efficacy, the higher the performance accomplishments and the lower the emotional arousal. The different lines of research reviewed show that the SEM may have wide explanatory power. Perceived self-efficacy helps to account for such diverse phenomena as changes in coping behavior produced by different modes of influence, level of physiological stress reactions, self-regulation of refractory behavior, resignation and despondency to failure experiences, self-debilitating effects of proxy control and illusory inefficaciousness, achievement strivings, growth of intrinsic interest, and career pursuits. The influential role of perceived collective efficacy in social change and the social conditions conducive to development of collective inefficacy are analyzed. (2½ p ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Abstract: Developed separate measures of job and work constructs using 3 techniques: semantic differential, questionnaire, and graphic. Assessment measures included the Job Involvement and Work Involvement Questionnaires, Job Involvement and Work Involvement Semantic Differentials, and Job Involvement and Work Involvement Graphic scales. Data collected from a heterogeneous sample of 703 employees are analyzed to establish reliability, construct validity, and criterion-related validity of each measure. Results reveal that questionnaire and graphic measures pass the tests of reliability and validity. Semantic differential measures, however, have questionable validity for measuring work involvement and should, perhaps, be limited to only highly educated samples of respondents. Results also support the conceptual distinction between job and work involvement. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Abstract: This paper summarizes a stream of research aimed at developing and validating a measure of employee commitment to work organizations. The instrument, developed by Porter and his colleagues, is called the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ). Based on a series of studies among 2563 employees in nine divergent organizations, satisfactory test-retest reliabilities and internal consistency reliabilities were found. In addition, cross-validated evidence of acceptable levels of predictive, convergent, and discriminant validity emerged for the instrument. Norms for males and females are presented based on the available sample. Possible instrument limitations and future research needs on the measurement and study of organizational commitment are reviewed.
Abstract: Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover summarizes the theory and research on employee-organization linkages, including the processes through which employees become linked to work organizations, the quality of such linkages, and how linkages are weakened or severed. The text identifies the determinants of employee commitment, absenteeism, and turnover, as well as their consequences for the individual, work groups, and the larger organization. The book also presents conceptual models on how employees become committed to, decide to be absent from, and decide to leave their organizations. Human resource practitioners, managers, employers, and industrial psychologists will find the book very informative and insightful.
Abstract: Studied changes across time in measures of organizational commitment and job satisfaction as each related to subsequent turnover among 60 recently employed psychiatric technician trainees. A longitudinal study across a 101/2-mo period was conducted, with attitude measures (Organizational Commitment Questionnaire and Job Descriptive Index) collected at 4 points in time. Results of a discriminant analysis indicate that significant relationships existed between certain attitudes held by employees and turnover. Relationships between attitudes and turnover were found in the last 2 time periods only, suggesting that such relationships are strongest at points in time closest to when an individual leaves the organization. Organizational commitment discriminated better between stayers and leavers than did the various components of job satisfaction. (36 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Abstract: A facet design describing the theoretical and empirical interrelationships among five forms of work commitment (Protestant work ethic, career salience, job involvement/work as a central life interest, organizational commitment, and union commitment) is presented. The analysis reveals that these concepts are partially redundant and insufficiently distinct to warrent continued separation. Suggestions for advancing the study of work commitment are rendered.
Abstract: The construct of prosocial organizational behavior is defined and 13 specific forms are described. They vary according to whether they are functional or dysfunctional for organizational effectiveness, prescribed or not prescribed as part of one's organizational role, and directed toward an individual or organizational target. Potential predictors and determinants drawn from the social psychological literature suggest an agenda for research in organizational settings.
Abstract: In this research we tested the relative importance of subjective appraisals of the job versus mood state in accounting for organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). A total of 369 individuals from two hospitals provided data concerning their typical mood state at work and appraisals of their jobs and their pay, and supervisors provided ratings of employee OCB. Subjects' evaluations of the job, notably with respect to pay, accounted for more unique variance in OCB than did the mood measures. The results suggest that OCB has a deliberate, controlled character and does not represent expressive behavior owing to emotional states. We offer a fairness interpretation of OCB, drawing from Blau's (1964) social exchange framework. Conclusions are tentative and qualified in view of the limitations of the data. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Abstract: Results of this field study of 597 employees demonstrate the importance of extra-role behavior in explaining employee performance over a six-month period. Supervisors, peers, and employees differentiated in-role from extra-role behavior. They also differentiated two related forms of promotive extra-role behavior: helping and voice. The authors cross-validate their results and conclude by discussing future research implications.
Abstract: 16 summer camp counselors (aged 20–35 yrs) and 16 members (aged 24–54 yrs) of an architectural firm were studied to explore the conditions at work in which people personally engage (express and employ) or disengage (withdraw and defend) their personal selves. The 3 psychological conditions that influence these behaviors are meaningfulness, safety, and availability. The nature of these conditions and their individual, social, and contextual sources are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Abstract: This article develops the concept of psychological presence to describe the experiential state enabling organization members to draw deeply on their personal selves in role performances, i.e., express thoughts and feelings, question assumptions, innovate. The dimensions of psychological presence are described along with relevant organizational and individual factors. The concept's implications for theory and research about the person-role relationship are described.
Abstract: Employees who are engaged in their work are fully connected with their work roles. They are bursting with energy, dedicated to their work, and immersed in their work activities. This article presents an overview of the concept of work engagement. I discuss the antecedents and consequences of engagement. The review shows that job and personal resources are the main predictors of engagement. These resources gain their salience in the context of high job demands. Engaged workers are more open to new information, more productive, and more willing to go the extra mile. Moreover, engaged workers proactively change their work environment in order to stay engaged. The findings of previous studies are integrated in an overall model that can be used to develop work engagement and advance job performance in today’s workplace.
Abstract: Building on Kahn's (1990) ethnographic work, a field study in a U.S. Midwestern insurance company explored the determinants and mediating effects of three psychological conditions — meaningfulness, safety and availability — on employees' engagement in their work. Results from the revised theoretical framework revealed that all three psychological conditions exhibited significant positive relations with engagement. Meaningfulness displayed the strongest relation. Job enrichment and work role fit were positively linked to psychological meaningfulness. Rewarding co-worker and supportive supervisor relations were positively associated with psychological safety, whereas adherence to co-worker norms and self-consciousness were negatively associated. Psychological availability was positively related to resources available and negatively related to participation in outside activities. Finally, the relations of job enrichment and work role fit with engagement were both fully mediated by the psychological condition of meaningfulness. The association between adherence to co-worker norms and engagement was partially mediated by psychological safety. Theoretical and practical implications related to psychological engagement at work are discussed.
Abstract: Purpose
– Employee engagement has become a hot topic in recent years among consulting firms and in the popular business press. However, employee engagement has rarely been studied in the academic literature and relatively little is known about its antecedents and consequences. The purpose of this study was to test a model of the antecedents and consequences of job and organization engagements based on social exchange theory.
Design/methodology/approach
– A survey was completed by 102 employees working in a variety of jobs and organizations. The average age was 34 and 60 percent were female. Participants had been in their current job for an average of four years, in their organization an average of five years, and had on average 12 years of work experience. The survey included measures of job and organization engagement as well as the antecedents and consequences of engagement.
Findings
– Results indicate that there is a meaningful difference between job and organization engagements and that perceived organizational support predicts both job and organization engagement; job characteristics predicts job engagement; and procedural justice predicts organization engagement. In addition, job and organization engagement mediated the relationships between the antecedents and job satisfaction, organizational commitment, intentions to quit, and organizational citizenship behavior.
Originality/value
– This is the first study to make a distinction between job and organization engagement and to measure a variety of antecedents and consequences of job and organization engagement. As a result, this study addresses concerns about that lack of academic research on employee engagement and speculation that it might just be the latest management fad.
Abstract: We theorize that engagement, conceptualized as the investment of an individual's complete self into a role, provides a more comprehensive explanation of relationships with performance than do well-known concepts that reflect narrower aspects of the individual's self. Results of a study of 245 firefighters and their supervisors supported our hypotheses that engagement mediates relationships between value congruence, perceived organizational support, and core self-evaluations, and two job performance dimensions: task performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Job involvement, job satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation were included as mediators but did not exceed engagement in explaining relationships among the antecedents and performance outcomes
Abstract: The present study investigates whether work engagement (measured by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale; UWES) could be empirically separated from job involvement and organizational commitment. In addition, psychometric properties of the Swedish UWES were investigated. Discriminant validity of the UWES was tested through inspection of latent intercorrelations between the constructs, confirmatory factor analyses, and patterns of correlations with other constructs (health complaints, job and personal factors, and turnover intention) in a sample of Information Communication Technology consultants (N = 186). Conclusion: Work engagement, job involvement, and organizational commitment are empirically distinct constructs and, thus, reflect different aspects of work attachment. The internal consistency of the Swedish UWES was satisfactory, but the dimensionality was somewhat unclear.
Abstract:
Objectives—Engagement at work has emerged as a potentially important employee performance and organizational management topic, however, the definition and measurement of engagement at work, and more specifically, nurse engagement, is poorly understood. The objective of this paper is to examine the current state of knowledge about engagement at work through a review of the literature. This review highlights the four lines of engagement research and focuses on the determinants and consequences of engagement at work. Methodological issues, as identified in the current research, and recommendations for future nurse-based engagement research are provided.
Design—A systematic review of the business, organizational psychology, and health sciences and health administration literature about engagement at work (1990–2007) was performed.
Data sources—The electronic databases for Health Sciences and Health Administration (CINAHL, MEDLINE), Business (ABI INFORM), and Psychology (PsycINFO) were systematically searched.
Review methods—Due to the limited amount of research that has examined engagement among the nursing workforce, published research that included varying employee types were included in this review. The selection criteria for this review include those studies that were: (1) written in English and (2) examined engagement at work in employee populations of any type within any work setting.
Results—The literature review identified four distinct lines of research that has focused on engagement within the employee work role. Of the 32 engagement-based articles referenced in this paper, a sample of 20 studies report on the examination of antecedents and/or consequences of engagement at work among varying employee types and work settings. Key findings suggest organizational factors versus individual contributors significantly impact engagement at work. A common implication in this body of research was that of the performance-based impact.
Conclusions—The study of nurses’ work engagement and its relationship to nurses’ organizational behavior, including work performance and healthcare organizational outcomes can be achieved by first building upon a conceptually consistent definition and measurement of work engagement. Future research is needed to provide nurse leaders with a better understanding of how nurse work engagement impacts organizational outcomes, including quality of care indicators.